« Go Back   « Go Back
Summary of Question 1

This proposed law would prohibit the use of certain traps for fur-bearing mammals, prohibit certain methods of hunting bear or bobcat, and eliminates some restrictions on who may serve on the state Fisheries and Wildlife Board.

The proposed law would prohibit the use, setting, manufacture, or possession of any trap to capture fur-bearing mammals, except common mouse and rat traps, nets, and box or cage traps that confine a whole animal without grasping any part of it. Traps designed to grip an animal's body or body part, crush as steel jaw leghold traps, padded leghold traps, and snares, would be prohibited. Federal and state health officials could use such traps in case of a threat to human health or safety. Where a property owner had reasonably tried but failed to correct an animal problem on the property using a legal trap, the owner could apply for and the state Director of Fisheries and Wildlife could issue a permit to use a prohibited type of trap, except a leghold trap, for up to 30 days to correct the problem.

A person violating any of these requirements could be punished by a fine of between $300 and $1000, or imprisonment for up to 6 months, or both, for each prohibited trap and each day of violation. A person convicted for a second violation would be required to surrender, and could never again obtain, any trapping license or problem animal control permit.

The proposed law would also prohibit the pursuit or hunting of bear or bobcat with the aid of a dog or dogs. Hunting bear using any type of bait, lure, or attraction, or knowingly hunting bear in a baited area, would also be prohibited. The Director could allow the use of dogs or bait in legitimate scientific research projects and in order to control particular animals that posed a threat to human safety or that destroyed livestock, property, or crops.

Violators could be punished by a fine of between $300 and $1000, or imprisonment for up to 6 months, or both, for each violation. A person convicted for a second violation would be required to surrender, and could never again obtain, any hunting and dog training licenses and permits.

The proposed law would eliminate the requirement that five members of the state Fisheries and Wildlife Board have held sporting licenses in the state for five consecutive years and that four members represent fishing, hunting, and trapping interests.

The proposed law states that if any of its provisions were declared invalid, the other provisions would remain in effect.

1996 - Statewide - Question 1Do you approve of a law summarized below, on which no vote was taken by the Senate or the House of Representatives before May 1, 1996?

View as: # | %  
County Blanks Total Votes Cast
Barnstable More »
 
63,287
39,970
8,670
111,927
Berkshire More »
 
26,717
26,588
8,492
61,797
Bristol More »
 
101,075
63,602
36,807
201,484
Dukes More »
 
9,936
5,347
1,180
16,463
Essex More »
 
175,145
81,188
40,112
296,445
Franklin More »
 
14,786
16,620
1,640
33,046
Hampden More »
 
83,820
57,725
32,823
174,368
Hampshire More »
 
35,293
25,559
5,552
66,404
Middlesex More »
 
366,976
168,441
101,277
636,694
Nantucket More »
 
2,996
908
300
4,204
Norfolk More »
 
179,669
88,281
38,896
306,846
Plymouth More »
 
105,137
68,968
23,046
197,151
Suffolk More »
 
116,588
38,422
51,014
206,024
Worcester More »
 
145,821
111,650
38,742
296,213
Totals
1,422,106
790,435
387,881 2,600,422