« Go Back   « Go Back
Summary of Question

The proposed law would limit certain taxes, and change laws relating to school budgets and compulsory binding arbitration. It would impose a limit on state and local taxes on real estate and personal property equal to 21/2% of the full and fair cash value of the property being taxed. If a locality currently imposes a tax greater than 2Vi% of that cash value, the tax would have to be decreased by 15% each year until the 21/2% level is reached. If a locality currently imposes a tax of less than 21/2%, it would not be allowed to increase the tax rate. In either situation, a city or town could raise its limit by a 2/3 local vote at a general election.

The proposed law would provide that the total taxes on real estate and personal property imposed by the state or by localities could never be increased by more than 21/2% of the total taxes imposed for the preceding year, unless two thirds of the voters agreed to the increase at a general election.

It would further provide that no law or regulation which imposes additional costs on a city ortown, or a law granting or increasing tax exemptions, would be effective unless the state agrees to assume the added cost. A division of the State Auditor's Department would determine the financial effect of laws and regulations on the various localities.

The proposal would limit the amount of money required to be appropriated for public schools to that amount voted upon by the local appropriating authority. It would also repeal the law which provides forcompulsory binding arbitration when labor negotiations concerning police and fire personnel come to an impasse. In addition, the petition would provide that no county, district, or authority could impose any annual increase in costs on a locality of greater than 4% of the total of the year before.

The proposed law would also reduce the maximum excise tax rate on motor vehicles from $66 per thousand to $25 per thousand, and it would allow a state income tax deduction equal to one half of the rent paid for the taxpayer's principal place of residence.

1980 - Hampden CountyDo you approve of a law summarized below, which was disapproved by the House of Representatives on May 6, 1980, by a vote of 5-146, and on which no vote was taken by the Senate before May 7, 1980?

View as: # | %

Hampden County Results
« Return to Aggregate Results

 
City/Town Ward Pct Blanks Total Votes Cast
Totals
83,103
66,446
11,636 161,185
Agawam
 
5,925
4,414
508
10,847
Blandford
 
225
273
12
510
Brimfield
 
681
393
43
1,117
Chester
 
264
201
24
489
Chicopee
 
14,329
9,529
886
24,744
Granville
 
386
218
21
625
Hampden
 
1,181
956
40
2,177
Holland
 
446
265
23
734
Holyoke
 
8,352
7,270
1,990
17,612
Longmeadow
 
3,301
3,147
277
6,725
Ludlow
 
5,009
2,879
290
8,178
Monson
 
1,696
1,422
95
3,213
Montgomery
 
169
173
9
351
Palmer
 
2,887
2,486
206
5,579
Russell
 
285
321
11
617
Southwick
 
1,716
1,191
82
2,989
Springfield
 
23,901
22,429
6,229
52,559
Tolland
 
65
60
9
134
Wales
 
349
177
15
541
Westfield
 
8,093
6,373
367
14,833
Wilbraham
 
3,843
2,269
499
6,611
County Totals
83,103
66,446
11,636 161,185