« Go Back   « Go Back
Summary of Question 3

The proposed law would reduce and then repeal the 7 1/2% surtax on Massachusetts state income taxes and would limit state tax revenue growth to the level of growth in total wages and salaries of the citizens of the state.

It would set the rate of the surtax on Massachusetts state income taxes at 3 3/4% for tax years beginning during 1986, and it would repeal the surtax for tax years beginning on or after January 1, 1987.

The allowable state tax revenues for any fiscal year are limited to the allowable state tax revenues for the prior fiscal year as increased by the average rate of growth of Massachusetts wages and salaries for the three immediately preceding calendar years, For purposes of calculating the proposed limit for fiscal year 1987, allowable state tax revenues for fiscal 1986 are the net tax revenues for that fiscal year, but excluding revenues derived from the surtax on state personal income tax, Further, if in any fiscal year the calculation of the limit results in allowable state tax revenues less than the amount of allowable state tax revenues for the prior year, then allowable state tax revenues for that fiscal year shall be equal to the allowable state tax revenues for the prior year, The revenues limited by this law would not include non-tax revenues such as federal reimbursements, tuitions, fees and earnings on investments.

The amount of allowable state tax revenues for any fiscal year would have to be reduced if a new state law were enacted allowing local governments to impose new or increased taxes or excises, The reduction would be equal to the amount of revenue derived from the new tax or increase, The reduction in state tax revenues would first take effect in the fiscal year following the enactment of the new law authorizing new local taxes or increases.

If state tax revenues exceed the limit imposed by the proposed law, as determined by the State Auditor, a tax credit would have to be granted equal to the total amount of excess tax revenue, The credit would be applied to the then current personal income tax liability of all taxpayers in proportion to their personal income tax liability in the preceding year.

The provisions of this Act could be enforced in court by a group of taxpayers.

1986 - Bristol County - Question 3Do you approve of a law summarized below, which was disapproved by the House of Representatives on May 6, 1986, by a vote of 49 - 93, and on which no vote was taken by the Senate before May 7, 1986?

View as: # | %

Bristol County Results
« Return to Aggregate Results

 
City/Town Ward Pct Blanks Total Votes Cast
Totals
67,745
49,237
18,200 135,182
Acushnet
 
1,997
1,454
434
3,885
Attleboro
 
4,873
3,102
821
8,796
Berkley
 
485
308
75
868
Dartmouth
 
4,016
2,814
999
7,829
Dighton
 
879
630
116
1,625
Easton
 
3,017
2,051
295
5,363
Fairhaven
 
3,014
2,200
1,075
6,289
Fall River
 
9,537
8,526
4,958
23,021
Freetown
 
1,269
798
143
2,210
Mansfield
 
2,224
1,445
254
3,923
New Bedford
 
12,800
9,337
3,776
25,913
N. Attleborough
 
3,238
1,966
391
5,595
Norton
 
1,734
1,165
218
3,117
Raynham
 
1,736
1,108
257
3,101
Rehoboth
 
1,269
828
175
2,272
Seekonk
 
2,055
1,302
258
3,615
Somerset
 
3,267
2,495
739
6,501
Swansea
 
2,276
1,695
536
4,507
Taunton
 
5,510
4,325
2,013
11,848
Westport
 
2,549
1,688
667
4,904
County Totals
67,745
49,237
18,200 135,182