« Go Back   « Go Back
Summary of Question 3

The proposed law would reduce and then repeal the 7 1/2% surtax on Massachusetts state income taxes and would limit state tax revenue growth to the level of growth in total wages and salaries of the citizens of the state.

It would set the rate of the surtax on Massachusetts state income taxes at 3 3/4% for tax years beginning during 1986, and it would repeal the surtax for tax years beginning on or after January 1, 1987.

The allowable state tax revenues for any fiscal year are limited to the allowable state tax revenues for the prior fiscal year as increased by the average rate of growth of Massachusetts wages and salaries for the three immediately preceding calendar years, For purposes of calculating the proposed limit for fiscal year 1987, allowable state tax revenues for fiscal 1986 are the net tax revenues for that fiscal year, but excluding revenues derived from the surtax on state personal income tax, Further, if in any fiscal year the calculation of the limit results in allowable state tax revenues less than the amount of allowable state tax revenues for the prior year, then allowable state tax revenues for that fiscal year shall be equal to the allowable state tax revenues for the prior year, The revenues limited by this law would not include non-tax revenues such as federal reimbursements, tuitions, fees and earnings on investments.

The amount of allowable state tax revenues for any fiscal year would have to be reduced if a new state law were enacted allowing local governments to impose new or increased taxes or excises, The reduction would be equal to the amount of revenue derived from the new tax or increase, The reduction in state tax revenues would first take effect in the fiscal year following the enactment of the new law authorizing new local taxes or increases.

If state tax revenues exceed the limit imposed by the proposed law, as determined by the State Auditor, a tax credit would have to be granted equal to the total amount of excess tax revenue, The credit would be applied to the then current personal income tax liability of all taxpayers in proportion to their personal income tax liability in the preceding year.

The provisions of this Act could be enforced in court by a group of taxpayers.

1986 - Essex County - Question 3Do you approve of a law summarized below, which was disapproved by the House of Representatives on May 6, 1986, by a vote of 49 - 93, and on which no vote was taken by the Senate before May 7, 1986?

View as: # | %

Essex County Results
« Return to Aggregate Results

 
City/Town Ward Pct Blanks Total Votes Cast
Totals
100,902
85,996
20,275 207,173
Amesbury
 
1,479
1,572
406
3,457
Andover
 
5,010
4,072
600
9,682
Beverly
 
6,227
5,026
1,149
12,402
Boxford
 
1,193
853
84
2,130
Danvers
 
4,653
3,359
645
8,657
Essex
 
513
512
74
1,099
Georgetown
 
996
956
119
2,071
Gloucester
 
3,255
3,693
1,091
8,039
Groveland
 
846
753
100
1,699
Hamilton
 
1,328
1,076
137
2,541
Haverhill
 
6,478
5,361
1,391
13,230
Ipswich
 
1,941
1,884
223
4,048
Lawrence
 
6,389
5,625
2,119
14,133
Lynn
 
11,136
9,086
2,768
22,990
Lynnfield
 
2,704
1,703
286
4,693
Manchester-by-the-Sea
 
855
1,165
114
2,134
Marblehead
 
4,249
3,520
440
8,209
Merrimac
 
753
616
93
1,462
Methuen
 
6,100
5,469
2,237
13,806
Middleton
 
764
702
94
1,560
Nahant
 
869
648
115
1,632
Newbury
 
1,073
868
134
2,075
Newburyport
 
2,478
2,352
581
5,411
N. Andover
 
3,734
3,034
553
7,321
Peabody
 
8,327
6,558
1,552
16,437
Rockport
 
1,264
1,460
236
2,960
Rowley
 
709
574
79
1,362
Salem
 
5,585
5,052
1,246
11,883
Salisbury
 
798
840
175
1,813
Saugus
 
4,158
3,334
723
8,215
Swampscott
 
2,489
2,304
481
5,274
Topsfield
 
1,240
906
120
2,266
Wenham
 
677
530
49
1,256
W. Newbury
 
632
533
61
1,226
County Totals
100,902
85,996
20,275 207,173