« Go Back   « Go Back
Summary of Question 3

The proposed law would reduce and then repeal the 7 1/2% surtax on Massachusetts state income taxes and would limit state tax revenue growth to the level of growth in total wages and salaries of the citizens of the state.

It would set the rate of the surtax on Massachusetts state income taxes at 3 3/4% for tax years beginning during 1986, and it would repeal the surtax for tax years beginning on or after January 1, 1987.

The allowable state tax revenues for any fiscal year are limited to the allowable state tax revenues for the prior fiscal year as increased by the average rate of growth of Massachusetts wages and salaries for the three immediately preceding calendar years, For purposes of calculating the proposed limit for fiscal year 1987, allowable state tax revenues for fiscal 1986 are the net tax revenues for that fiscal year, but excluding revenues derived from the surtax on state personal income tax, Further, if in any fiscal year the calculation of the limit results in allowable state tax revenues less than the amount of allowable state tax revenues for the prior year, then allowable state tax revenues for that fiscal year shall be equal to the allowable state tax revenues for the prior year, The revenues limited by this law would not include non-tax revenues such as federal reimbursements, tuitions, fees and earnings on investments.

The amount of allowable state tax revenues for any fiscal year would have to be reduced if a new state law were enacted allowing local governments to impose new or increased taxes or excises, The reduction would be equal to the amount of revenue derived from the new tax or increase, The reduction in state tax revenues would first take effect in the fiscal year following the enactment of the new law authorizing new local taxes or increases.

If state tax revenues exceed the limit imposed by the proposed law, as determined by the State Auditor, a tax credit would have to be granted equal to the total amount of excess tax revenue, The credit would be applied to the then current personal income tax liability of all taxpayers in proportion to their personal income tax liability in the preceding year.

The provisions of this Act could be enforced in court by a group of taxpayers.

1986 - Franklin County - Question 3Do you approve of a law summarized below, which was disapproved by the House of Representatives on May 6, 1986, by a vote of 49 - 93, and on which no vote was taken by the Senate before May 7, 1986?

View as: # | %

Franklin County Results
« Return to Aggregate Results

 
City/Town Ward Pct Blanks Total Votes Cast
Totals
9,346
10,656
1,740 21,742
Ashfield
 
244
300
54
598
Bernardston
 
272
326
50
648
Buckland
 
270
324
34
628
Charlemont
 
185
143
31
359
Colrain
 
245
210
40
495
Conway
 
217
289
30
536
Deerfield
 
659
854
74
1,587
Erving
 
267
202
34
503
Gill
 
199
249
39
487
Greenfield
 
2,315
2,752
561
5,628
Hawley
 
47
59
7
113
Heath
 
90
101
10
201
Leverett
 
194
421
32
647
Leyden
 
101
102
16
219
Monroe
 
28
22
4
54
Montague
 
1,165
1,273
212
2,650
New Salem
 
145
124
25
294
Northfield
 
449
427
96
972
Orange
 
1,010
764
173
1,947
Rowe
 
87
56
14
157
Shelburne
 
257
341
51
649
Shutesbury
 
145
316
20
481
Sunderland
 
324
458
54
836
Warwick
 
72
129
17
218
Wendell
 
110
120
18
248
Whately
 
249
294
44
587
County Totals
9,346
10,656
1,740 21,742