« Go Back   « Go Back
Summary of Question 1

This proposed law would limit the way in which business and certain nonprofit corporations could contribute to and spend money on campaigns involving an initiative, referendum or other question submitted to the voters at a state or local elecion. The proposed law would require ballot committees organized to support or oppose any question submitted to the voters to disclose promptly certain contributions made late in the campaign; would establish procedures that business and certain nonprofit corporations would have to follow in orderto spend money on ballot question campaigns; and would establish voluntary spending limits for ballot committees.

The proposed law would require a ballot committee to report to the state Office of Campaign and Political Finance, within one business day of receipt, the name, address, occupation and employer of any person or organization making a contribution of $1,000 or more, if the contribution was made before the date of the election but after the closing date of the last official campaign contribution report.

Under the proposed law, business and certain nonprofit corporations would be prohibited from making contributions or expenditures to support or oppose a ballot question, but would be permitted to create and solicit contributions to a separate fund to be used to support or oppose a ballot question. A separate fund would be required for each ballot question on which the corporation intended to solicit contributions. The corporation would be required to report all amounts spent to establish and administer the fund to the Office of Campaign and Political Finance, and to a city or town if the fund were established to influence the vote on a local ballot question.

Contributions to the separate fund could be solicited only from members or stockholders, officers and directors, and employees at a policymaking, managerial or professional level. Corecion, job discrimination and financial reprisals as methods of soliciting contributions would be prohibited. Nonprofit corporations that are formed for the purpose of promoting political ideas, do not engage in business activities, have no shareholders, and do not have business corporations as members or accept more than one percent of their revenues from such corporations would be exempt from these provisions. A business organization that violated these requirements could be fined up to $50,000, and any director or agent of a business organization who violates or authorizes the violation of these requirments could be fined up to $10,000 and/or imprisoned for up to one year.

The proposed law would establish voluntary spending limits for ballot committees at $1,000,000 in the year of an election, and $250,000 in the years immediately before and after an erection. Ballot committees agreeing to observe these voluntary limits would be permitted to announce their compliance on advertisements and campaign materials. Ballot committees that agreed to observe the spending limits and later exceeded the limits could be fined up to $10,000.

The proposed law states that if any of its provisions were declared invalid, the other provisions would remain in effect.

1994 - Berkshire County - Question 1Do you approve of a law summarized below, on which no vote was taken by the Senate or the House of Representatives before May 4, 1994?

View as: # | %

Berkshire County Results
« Return to Aggregate Results

 
City/Town Ward Pct Blanks Total Votes Cast
Totals
25,296
19,433
5,005 49,734
Adams
 
1,822
1,661
284
3,767
Alford
 
95
73
16
184
Becket
 
298
232
30
560
Cheshire
 
760
563
102
1,425
Clarksburg
 
325
365
23
713
Dalton
 
1,408
995
193
2,596
Egremont
 
330
176
50
556
Florida
 
133
136
15
284
Great Barrington
 
1,282
916
354
2,552
Hancock
 
147
86
27
260
Hinsdale
 
316
273
45
634
Lanesborough
 
613
388
93
1,094
Lee
 
1,069
927
350
2,346
Lenox
 
1,338
827
257
2,422
Monterey
 
226
111
21
358
Mount Washington
 
45
13
5
63
New Ashford
 
53
34
4
91
New Marlborough
 
236
184
51
471
N. Adams
 
1,982
2,289
383
4,654
Otis
 
207
206
36
449
Peru
 
130
118
15
263
Pittsfield
 
8,298
5,935
2,020
16,253
Richmond
 
442
285
45
772
Sandisfield
 
150
89
19
258
Savoy
 
105
108
17
230
Sheffield
 
658
466
99
1,223
Stockbridge
 
621
374
104
1,099
Tyringham
 
105
56
20
181
Washington
 
133
88
12
233
W. Stockbridge
 
356
205
71
632
Williamstown
 
1,547
1,197
237
2,981
Windsor
 
199
145
19
363
County Totals
25,296
19,433
5,005 49,734