« Go Back   « Go Back
Summary of Question 1

This proposed law would limit the way in which business and certain nonprofit corporations could contribute to and spend money on campaigns involving an initiative, referendum or other question submitted to the voters at a state or local elecion. The proposed law would require ballot committees organized to support or oppose any question submitted to the voters to disclose promptly certain contributions made late in the campaign; would establish procedures that business and certain nonprofit corporations would have to follow in orderto spend money on ballot question campaigns; and would establish voluntary spending limits for ballot committees.

The proposed law would require a ballot committee to report to the state Office of Campaign and Political Finance, within one business day of receipt, the name, address, occupation and employer of any person or organization making a contribution of $1,000 or more, if the contribution was made before the date of the election but after the closing date of the last official campaign contribution report.

Under the proposed law, business and certain nonprofit corporations would be prohibited from making contributions or expenditures to support or oppose a ballot question, but would be permitted to create and solicit contributions to a separate fund to be used to support or oppose a ballot question. A separate fund would be required for each ballot question on which the corporation intended to solicit contributions. The corporation would be required to report all amounts spent to establish and administer the fund to the Office of Campaign and Political Finance, and to a city or town if the fund were established to influence the vote on a local ballot question.

Contributions to the separate fund could be solicited only from members or stockholders, officers and directors, and employees at a policymaking, managerial or professional level. Corecion, job discrimination and financial reprisals as methods of soliciting contributions would be prohibited. Nonprofit corporations that are formed for the purpose of promoting political ideas, do not engage in business activities, have no shareholders, and do not have business corporations as members or accept more than one percent of their revenues from such corporations would be exempt from these provisions. A business organization that violated these requirements could be fined up to $50,000, and any director or agent of a business organization who violates or authorizes the violation of these requirments could be fined up to $10,000 and/or imprisoned for up to one year.

The proposed law would establish voluntary spending limits for ballot committees at $1,000,000 in the year of an election, and $250,000 in the years immediately before and after an erection. Ballot committees agreeing to observe these voluntary limits would be permitted to announce their compliance on advertisements and campaign materials. Ballot committees that agreed to observe the spending limits and later exceeded the limits could be fined up to $10,000.

The proposed law states that if any of its provisions were declared invalid, the other provisions would remain in effect.

1994 - Worcester County - Question 1Do you approve of a law summarized below, on which no vote was taken by the Senate or the House of Representatives before May 4, 1994?

View as: # | %

Worcester County Results
« Return to Aggregate Results

 
City/Town Ward Pct Blanks Total Votes Cast
Totals
84,783
148,459
17,130 250,374
Ashburnham
 
711
1,144
111
1,966
Athol
 
981
2,185
228
3,394
Auburn
 
2,234
4,079
304
6,617
Barre
 
658
1,113
134
1,905
Berlin
 
368
638
43
1,049
Blackstone
 
1,130
1,363
275
2,768
Bolton
 
615
983
64
1,662
Boylston
 
618
1,179
71
1,868
Brookfield
 
406
641
75
1,122
Charlton
 
1,274
1,971
148
3,393
Clinton
 
1,571
3,202
430
5,203
Douglas
 
780
1,282
119
2,181
Dudley
 
1,147
1,880
295
3,322
E. Brookfield
 
234
478
47
759
Fitchburg
 
3,687
6,046
878
10,611
Gardner
 
1,886
3,989
676
6,551
Grafton
 
1,955
3,107
282
5,344
Hardwick
 
387
549
63
999
Harvard
 
913
1,493
111
2,517
Holden
 
2,104
4,696
417
7,217
Hopedale
 
857
1,416
173
2,446
Hubbardston
 
452
727
63
1,242
Lancaster
 
753
1,382
106
2,241
Leicester
 
1,345
2,490
263
4,098
Leominster
 
4,154
7,583
1,372
13,109
Lunenburg
 
1,199
2,193
221
3,613
Mendon
 
595
1,141
100
1,836
Milford
 
3,135
5,132
710
8,977
Millbury
 
1,660
2,822
302
4,784
Millville
 
321
431
91
843
New Braintree
 
151
202
25
378
N. Brookfield
 
576
1,025
122
1,723
Northborough
 
2,026
3,382
197
5,605
Northbridge
 
1,613
2,804
340
4,757
Oakham
 
240
414
35
689
Oxford
 
1,469
2,495
394
4,358
Paxton
 
611
1,313
90
2,014
Petersham
 
214
349
36
599
Phillipston
 
163
306
17
486
Princeton
 
464
998
69
1,531
Royalston
 
137
249
21
407
Rutland
 
593
1,288
151
2,032
Shrewsbury
 
4,121
7,142
541
11,804
Southborough
 
1,299
2,098
179
3,576
Southbridge
 
1,620
3,104
670
5,394
Spencer
 
1,360
2,383
195
3,938
Sterling
 
1,003
1,845
119
2,967
Sturbridge
 
1,052
1,913
324
3,289
Sutton
 
959
1,892
183
3,034
Templeton
 
716
1,411
96
2,223
Upton
 
839
1,552
124
2,515
Uxbridge
 
1,298
2,378
280
3,956
Warren
 
576
882
107
1,565
Webster
 
1,707
3,036
508
5,251
W. Boylston
 
961
1,990
142
3,093
W. Brookfield
 
455
803
76
1,334
Westborough
 
2,151
3,933
278
6,362
Westminster
 
871
1,645
104
2,620
Winchendon
 
793
1,327
197
2,317
Worcester
 
16,615
26,965
3,340
46,920
County Totals
84,783
148,459
17,130 250,374