« Go Back   « Go Back
Summary of Question 1

This proposed law would prohibit the use of certain traps for fur-bearing mammals, prohibit certain methods of hunting bear or bobcat, and eliminates some restrictions on who may serve on the state Fisheries and Wildlife Board.

The proposed law would prohibit the use, setting, manufacture, or possession of any trap to capture fur-bearing mammals, except common mouse and rat traps, nets, and box or cage traps that confine a whole animal without grasping any part of it. Traps designed to grip an animal's body or body part, crush as steel jaw leghold traps, padded leghold traps, and snares, would be prohibited. Federal and state health officials could use such traps in case of a threat to human health or safety. Where a property owner had reasonably tried but failed to correct an animal problem on the property using a legal trap, the owner could apply for and the state Director of Fisheries and Wildlife could issue a permit to use a prohibited type of trap, except a leghold trap, for up to 30 days to correct the problem.

A person violating any of these requirements could be punished by a fine of between $300 and $1000, or imprisonment for up to 6 months, or both, for each prohibited trap and each day of violation. A person convicted for a second violation would be required to surrender, and could never again obtain, any trapping license or problem animal control permit.

The proposed law would also prohibit the pursuit or hunting of bear or bobcat with the aid of a dog or dogs. Hunting bear using any type of bait, lure, or attraction, or knowingly hunting bear in a baited area, would also be prohibited. The Director could allow the use of dogs or bait in legitimate scientific research projects and in order to control particular animals that posed a threat to human safety or that destroyed livestock, property, or crops.

Violators could be punished by a fine of between $300 and $1000, or imprisonment for up to 6 months, or both, for each violation. A person convicted for a second violation would be required to surrender, and could never again obtain, any hunting and dog training licenses and permits.

The proposed law would eliminate the requirement that five members of the state Fisheries and Wildlife Board have held sporting licenses in the state for five consecutive years and that four members represent fishing, hunting, and trapping interests.

The proposed law states that if any of its provisions were declared invalid, the other provisions would remain in effect.

1996 - Barnstable County - Question 1Do you approve of a law summarized below, on which no vote was taken by the Senate or the House of Representatives before May 1, 1996?

View as: # | %

Barnstable County Results
« Return to Aggregate Results

 
City/Town Ward Pct Blanks Total Votes Cast
Barnstable
 
12,910
8,114
1,443
22,467
Bourne
 
3,669
2,917
1,446
8,032
Brewster
 
3,476
1,724
298
5,498
Chatham
 
2,672
1,373
430
4,475
Dennis
 
4,887
2,937
669
8,493
Eastham
 
1,889
1,101
161
3,151
Falmouth
 
8,026
6,759
1,439
16,224
Harwich
 
3,987
2,219
531
6,737
Mashpee
 
2,535
1,962
465
4,962
Orleans
 
2,544
1,439
246
4,229
Provincetown
 
1,792
340
136
2,268
Sandwich
 
5,580
3,767
410
9,757
Truro
 
779
339
38
1,156
Wellfleet
 
1,194
519
55
1,768
Yarmouth
 
7,347
4,460
903
12,710
County Totals
63,287
39,970
8,670 111,927