« Go Back   « Go Back
Summary of Question 1

This proposed law would prohibit the use of certain traps for fur-bearing mammals, prohibit certain methods of hunting bear or bobcat, and eliminates some restrictions on who may serve on the state Fisheries and Wildlife Board.

The proposed law would prohibit the use, setting, manufacture, or possession of any trap to capture fur-bearing mammals, except common mouse and rat traps, nets, and box or cage traps that confine a whole animal without grasping any part of it. Traps designed to grip an animal's body or body part, crush as steel jaw leghold traps, padded leghold traps, and snares, would be prohibited. Federal and state health officials could use such traps in case of a threat to human health or safety. Where a property owner had reasonably tried but failed to correct an animal problem on the property using a legal trap, the owner could apply for and the state Director of Fisheries and Wildlife could issue a permit to use a prohibited type of trap, except a leghold trap, for up to 30 days to correct the problem.

A person violating any of these requirements could be punished by a fine of between $300 and $1000, or imprisonment for up to 6 months, or both, for each prohibited trap and each day of violation. A person convicted for a second violation would be required to surrender, and could never again obtain, any trapping license or problem animal control permit.

The proposed law would also prohibit the pursuit or hunting of bear or bobcat with the aid of a dog or dogs. Hunting bear using any type of bait, lure, or attraction, or knowingly hunting bear in a baited area, would also be prohibited. The Director could allow the use of dogs or bait in legitimate scientific research projects and in order to control particular animals that posed a threat to human safety or that destroyed livestock, property, or crops.

Violators could be punished by a fine of between $300 and $1000, or imprisonment for up to 6 months, or both, for each violation. A person convicted for a second violation would be required to surrender, and could never again obtain, any hunting and dog training licenses and permits.

The proposed law would eliminate the requirement that five members of the state Fisheries and Wildlife Board have held sporting licenses in the state for five consecutive years and that four members represent fishing, hunting, and trapping interests.

The proposed law states that if any of its provisions were declared invalid, the other provisions would remain in effect.

1996 - Franklin County - Question 1Do you approve of a law summarized below, on which no vote was taken by the Senate or the House of Representatives before May 1, 1996?

View as: # | %

Franklin County Results
« Return to Aggregate Results

 
City/Town Ward Pct Blanks Total Votes Cast
Totals
14,786
16,620
1,640 33,046
Ashfield
 
468
475
29
972
Bernardston
 
361
606
52
1,019
Buckland
 
338
495
111
944
Charlemont
 
224
306
16
546
Colrain
 
279
550
16
845
Conway
 
453
539
19
1,011
Deerfield
 
1,231
1,381
81
2,693
Erving
 
196
452
53
701
Gill
 
298
400
47
745
Greenfield
 
3,603
3,563
548
7,714
Hawley
 
59
92
4
155
Heath
 
140
211
19
370
Leverett
 
657
378
33
1,068
Leyden
 
136
196
19
351
Monroe
 
12
43
3
58
Montague
 
1,692
1,796
176
3,664
New Salem
 
207
245
15
467
Northfield
 
625
755
68
1,448
Orange
 
1,105
1,654
128
2,887
Rowe
 
104
106
8
218
Shelburne
 
428
511
56
995
Shutesbury
 
574
363
26
963
Sunderland
 
824
686
54
1,564
Warwick
 
154
205
22
381
Wendell
 
242
180
7
429
Whately
 
376
432
30
838
County Totals
14,786
16,620
1,640 33,046