« Go Back   « Go Back
Summary of Question 1

This proposed law would prohibit the use of certain traps for fur-bearing mammals, prohibit certain methods of hunting bear or bobcat, and eliminates some restrictions on who may serve on the state Fisheries and Wildlife Board.

The proposed law would prohibit the use, setting, manufacture, or possession of any trap to capture fur-bearing mammals, except common mouse and rat traps, nets, and box or cage traps that confine a whole animal without grasping any part of it. Traps designed to grip an animal's body or body part, crush as steel jaw leghold traps, padded leghold traps, and snares, would be prohibited. Federal and state health officials could use such traps in case of a threat to human health or safety. Where a property owner had reasonably tried but failed to correct an animal problem on the property using a legal trap, the owner could apply for and the state Director of Fisheries and Wildlife could issue a permit to use a prohibited type of trap, except a leghold trap, for up to 30 days to correct the problem.

A person violating any of these requirements could be punished by a fine of between $300 and $1000, or imprisonment for up to 6 months, or both, for each prohibited trap and each day of violation. A person convicted for a second violation would be required to surrender, and could never again obtain, any trapping license or problem animal control permit.

The proposed law would also prohibit the pursuit or hunting of bear or bobcat with the aid of a dog or dogs. Hunting bear using any type of bait, lure, or attraction, or knowingly hunting bear in a baited area, would also be prohibited. The Director could allow the use of dogs or bait in legitimate scientific research projects and in order to control particular animals that posed a threat to human safety or that destroyed livestock, property, or crops.

Violators could be punished by a fine of between $300 and $1000, or imprisonment for up to 6 months, or both, for each violation. A person convicted for a second violation would be required to surrender, and could never again obtain, any hunting and dog training licenses and permits.

The proposed law would eliminate the requirement that five members of the state Fisheries and Wildlife Board have held sporting licenses in the state for five consecutive years and that four members represent fishing, hunting, and trapping interests.

The proposed law states that if any of its provisions were declared invalid, the other provisions would remain in effect.

1996 - Hampden County - Question 1Do you approve of a law summarized below, on which no vote was taken by the Senate or the House of Representatives before May 1, 1996?

View as: # | %

Hampden County Results
« Return to Aggregate Results

 
City/Town Ward Pct Blanks Total Votes Cast
Totals
83,820
57,725
32,823 174,368
Agawam
 
5,221
3,489
3,853
12,563
Blandford
 
253
314
9
576
Brimfield
 
739
663
75
1,477
Chester
 
200
362
15
577
Chicopee
 
10,844
7,908
3,577
22,329
E. Longmeadow
 
3,879
2,526
948
7,353
Granville
 
306
360
39
705
Hampden
 
1,281
1,070
140
2,491
Holland
 
505
386
61
952
Holyoke
 
7,132
3,912
3,470
14,514
Longmeadow
 
5,170
2,331
1,343
8,844
Ludlow
 
3,731
3,470
1,226
8,427
Monson
 
1,625
1,622
265
3,512
Montgomery
 
170
216
16
402
Palmer
 
2,053
2,580
672
5,305
Russell
 
234
387
28
649
Southwick
 
1,774
1,706
188
3,668
Springfield
 
22,193
11,863
10,558
44,614
Tolland
 
94
89
4
187
Wales
 
302
333
36
671
W. Springfield
 
4,906
3,635
3,241
11,782
Westfield
 
7,490
5,915
2,326
15,731
Wilbraham
 
3,718
2,588
733
7,039
County Totals
83,820
57,725
32,823 174,368