« Go Back   « Go Back
Summary of Question 1

This proposed law would prohibit the use of certain traps for fur-bearing mammals, prohibit certain methods of hunting bear or bobcat, and eliminates some restrictions on who may serve on the state Fisheries and Wildlife Board.

The proposed law would prohibit the use, setting, manufacture, or possession of any trap to capture fur-bearing mammals, except common mouse and rat traps, nets, and box or cage traps that confine a whole animal without grasping any part of it. Traps designed to grip an animal's body or body part, crush as steel jaw leghold traps, padded leghold traps, and snares, would be prohibited. Federal and state health officials could use such traps in case of a threat to human health or safety. Where a property owner had reasonably tried but failed to correct an animal problem on the property using a legal trap, the owner could apply for and the state Director of Fisheries and Wildlife could issue a permit to use a prohibited type of trap, except a leghold trap, for up to 30 days to correct the problem.

A person violating any of these requirements could be punished by a fine of between $300 and $1000, or imprisonment for up to 6 months, or both, for each prohibited trap and each day of violation. A person convicted for a second violation would be required to surrender, and could never again obtain, any trapping license or problem animal control permit.

The proposed law would also prohibit the pursuit or hunting of bear or bobcat with the aid of a dog or dogs. Hunting bear using any type of bait, lure, or attraction, or knowingly hunting bear in a baited area, would also be prohibited. The Director could allow the use of dogs or bait in legitimate scientific research projects and in order to control particular animals that posed a threat to human safety or that destroyed livestock, property, or crops.

Violators could be punished by a fine of between $300 and $1000, or imprisonment for up to 6 months, or both, for each violation. A person convicted for a second violation would be required to surrender, and could never again obtain, any hunting and dog training licenses and permits.

The proposed law would eliminate the requirement that five members of the state Fisheries and Wildlife Board have held sporting licenses in the state for five consecutive years and that four members represent fishing, hunting, and trapping interests.

The proposed law states that if any of its provisions were declared invalid, the other provisions would remain in effect.

1996 - Norfolk County - Question 1Do you approve of a law summarized below, on which no vote was taken by the Senate or the House of Representatives before May 1, 1996?

View as: # | %

Norfolk County Results
« Return to Aggregate Results

 
City/Town Ward Pct Blanks Total Votes Cast
Totals
179,669
88,281
38,896 306,846
Avon
 
1,141
741
493
2,375
Bellingham
 
3,639
2,441
527
6,607
Braintree
 
10,019
4,613
2,366
16,998
Brookline
 
14,190
4,203
6,575
24,968
Canton
 
5,993
2,974
1,595
10,562
Cohasset
 
2,595
1,222
475
4,292
Dedham
 
6,377
3,565
1,818
11,760
Dover
 
1,869
968
351
3,188
Foxborough
 
4,627
2,788
801
8,216
Franklin
 
6,980
4,693
653
12,326
Holbrook
 
2,688
1,548
719
4,955
Medfield
 
3,500
2,197
512
6,209
Medway
 
3,106
1,939
376
5,421
Millis
 
2,304
1,466
181
3,951
Milton
 
8,113
3,843
1,960
13,916
Needham
 
10,532
4,654
1,133
16,319
Norfolk
 
2,191
1,839
323
4,353
Norwood
 
7,370
4,092
2,326
13,788
Plainville
 
1,786
1,212
198
3,196
Quincy
 
22,467
8,634
5,777
36,878
Randolph
 
7,641
3,245
1,596
12,482
Sharon
 
5,959
2,561
556
9,076
Stoughton
 
6,638
3,940
2,041
12,619
Walpole
 
6,374
4,089
801
11,264
Wellesley
 
8,845
3,615
1,260
13,720
Westwood
 
4,602
2,441
738
7,781
Weymouth
 
15,722
6,810
2,447
24,979
Wrentham
 
2,401
1,948
298
4,647
County Totals
179,669
88,281
38,896 306,846