« Go Back   « Go Back
Summary of Question 1

This proposed law would prohibit the use of certain traps for fur-bearing mammals, prohibit certain methods of hunting bear or bobcat, and eliminates some restrictions on who may serve on the state Fisheries and Wildlife Board.

The proposed law would prohibit the use, setting, manufacture, or possession of any trap to capture fur-bearing mammals, except common mouse and rat traps, nets, and box or cage traps that confine a whole animal without grasping any part of it. Traps designed to grip an animal's body or body part, crush as steel jaw leghold traps, padded leghold traps, and snares, would be prohibited. Federal and state health officials could use such traps in case of a threat to human health or safety. Where a property owner had reasonably tried but failed to correct an animal problem on the property using a legal trap, the owner could apply for and the state Director of Fisheries and Wildlife could issue a permit to use a prohibited type of trap, except a leghold trap, for up to 30 days to correct the problem.

A person violating any of these requirements could be punished by a fine of between $300 and $1000, or imprisonment for up to 6 months, or both, for each prohibited trap and each day of violation. A person convicted for a second violation would be required to surrender, and could never again obtain, any trapping license or problem animal control permit.

The proposed law would also prohibit the pursuit or hunting of bear or bobcat with the aid of a dog or dogs. Hunting bear using any type of bait, lure, or attraction, or knowingly hunting bear in a baited area, would also be prohibited. The Director could allow the use of dogs or bait in legitimate scientific research projects and in order to control particular animals that posed a threat to human safety or that destroyed livestock, property, or crops.

Violators could be punished by a fine of between $300 and $1000, or imprisonment for up to 6 months, or both, for each violation. A person convicted for a second violation would be required to surrender, and could never again obtain, any hunting and dog training licenses and permits.

The proposed law would eliminate the requirement that five members of the state Fisheries and Wildlife Board have held sporting licenses in the state for five consecutive years and that four members represent fishing, hunting, and trapping interests.

The proposed law states that if any of its provisions were declared invalid, the other provisions would remain in effect.

1996 - Plymouth County - Question 1Do you approve of a law summarized below, on which no vote was taken by the Senate or the House of Representatives before May 1, 1996?

View as: # | %

Plymouth County Results
« Return to Aggregate Results

 
City/Town Ward Pct Blanks Total Votes Cast
Totals
105,137
68,968
23,046 197,151
Abington
 
3,382
2,640
694
6,716
Bridgewater
 
4,035
3,631
897
8,563
Brockton
 
12,828
8,969
5,673
27,470
Carver
 
2,628
1,967
278
4,873
Duxbury
 
4,736
2,504
831
8,071
E. Bridgewater
 
2,250
2,733
334
5,317
Halifax
 
1,721
1,454
174
3,349
Hanover
 
3,785
2,151
469
6,405
Hanson
 
2,253
1,770
374
4,397
Hingham
 
6,648
3,094
1,531
11,273
Hull
 
3,030
1,326
714
5,070
Kingston
 
2,968
1,665
268
4,901
Lakeville
 
1,744
1,783
568
4,095
Marion
 
1,491
844
264
2,599
Marshfield
 
7,169
3,785
594
11,548
Mattapoisett
 
1,836
1,238
359
3,433
Middleborough
 
3,249
3,528
547
7,324
Norwell
 
2,516
1,293
1,505
5,314
Pembroke
 
4,076
2,636
658
7,370
Plymouth
 
12,576
6,634
1,456
20,666
Plympton
 
665
596
54
1,315
Rochester
 
1,045
950
128
2,123
Rockland
 
3,951
2,324
1,061
7,336
Scituate
 
5,680
2,917
1,251
9,848
Wareham
 
4,344
2,902
1,056
8,302
W. Bridgewater
 
1,324
1,337
735
3,396
Whitman
 
3,207
2,297
573
6,077
County Totals
105,137
68,968
23,046 197,151