« Go Back   « Go Back
Summary of Question 3
This proposed law would allow licensed and other authorized providers of child care in private homes under the state's subsidized child care system to bargain collectively with the relevant state agencies about all terms and conditions of the provision of child care services under the state's child care assistance program and its regulations. Under the proposed law, these family child care providers who provide state-subsidized child care would not be considered public employees, but if 30% of the providers gave written authorization for an employee organization to be their exclusive representative in collective bargaining, the state Labor Relations Commission would hold a secret mail ballot election on whether to certify that organization as the exclusive representative. Parts of the state's public employee labor relations law and regulations would apply to the election and collective bargaining processes. The proposed law would not authorize providers to engage in a strike or other refusal to deliver child care services. An exclusive representative, if certified, could then communicate with providers to develop and present a proposal to the state agencies concerning the terms and conditions of child care provider services. The proposed law would then require the parties to negotiate in good faith to try to reach a binding agreement. If the agreed-upon terms and conditions required changes in existing regulations, the state agencies could not finally agree to the terms until they completed the required procedures for changing regulations and any cost items agreed to by the parties had been approved by the state Legislature. If any actions taken under the proposed law required spending state funds, that spending would be subject to appropriation by the Legislature. Any complaint that one of the parties was refusing to negotiate in good faith could be filed with and ruled upon by the Labor Relations Commission. An exclusive representative could collect a fee from providers for the costs of representing them. An exclusive representative could be de-certified under Commission regulations and procedures if certain conditions were met. The Commission could not accept a decertification petition for at least 2 years after the first exclusive representative was certified, and any such petition would have to be supported by 50% or more of the total number of providers. The Commission would then hold a secret mail ballot election for the providers to vote on whether to decertify the exclusive representative. The proposed law states that activities carried out under it would be exempt from federal anti-trust laws. The proposed law states that if any of its parts were declared invalid, the other parts would stay in effect.

2006 - Middlesex County - Question 3Do you approve of a law summarized below, on which no vote was taken by the Senate or the House of Representatives before May 3, 2006?

View as: # | %

Middlesex County Results
« Return to Aggregate Results

 
City/Town Ward Pct Blanks Total Votes Cast
Totals
227,498
248,759
62,187 538,444
Acton More »
 
3,604
4,110
997
8,711
Arlington More »
 
9,326
8,929
1,956
20,211
Ashby
 
586
639
121
1,346
Ashland More »
 
2,542
3,038
500
6,080
Ayer More »
 
1,044
1,164
187
2,395
Bedford More »
 
2,232
2,815
663
5,710
Belmont More »
 
4,638
5,192
1,209
11,039
Billerica More »
 
5,295
7,251
1,145
13,691
Boxborough
 
876
1,048
167
2,091
Burlington More »
 
4,222
4,672
586
9,480
Cambridge More »
 
18,240
9,712
4,668
32,620
Carlisle
 
1,060
1,336
233
2,629
Chelmsford More »
 
5,452
8,079
1,241
14,772
Concord More »
 
3,442
4,019
1,012
8,473
Dracut More »
 
3,856
5,554
953
10,363
Dunstable
 
494
761
107
1,362
Everett More »
 
4,086
3,655
2,073
9,814
Framingham More »
 
8,228
9,536
2,550
20,314
Groton More »
 
1,767
2,313
502
4,582
Holliston More »
 
2,547
3,347
584
6,478
Hopkinton More »
 
2,269
3,148
603
6,020
Hudson More »
 
2,744
3,500
729
6,973
Lexington More »
 
6,175
6,418
1,553
14,146
Lincoln More »
 
1,194
1,213
357
2,764
Littleton More »
 
1,633
1,957
292
3,882
Lowell More »
 
9,003
9,452
2,893
21,348
Malden More »
 
6,656
5,578
1,905
14,139
Marlborough More »
 
4,653
5,864
1,345
11,862
Maynard More »
 
1,857
2,128
508
4,493
Medford More »
 
8,956
8,055
2,673
19,684
Melrose More »
 
5,109
5,640
1,230
11,979
Natick More »
 
5,713
6,625
1,363
13,701
Newton More »
 
14,852
14,370
4,596
33,818
N. Reading More »
 
2,300
3,375
536
6,211
Pepperell More »
 
1,760
2,371
398
4,529
Reading More »
 
3,677
5,518
1,053
10,248
Sherborn
 
781
1,206
235
2,222
Shirley
 
956
1,175
170
2,301
Somerville More »
 
12,226
7,186
2,918
22,330
Stoneham More »
 
3,690
4,571
890
9,151
Stow
 
313
1,166
1,638
3,117
Sudbury More »
 
2,861
4,134
835
7,830
Tewksbury More »
 
4,443
6,309
788
11,540
Townsend More »
 
1,300
1,792
298
3,390
Tyngsborough More »
 
1,507
2,310
528
4,345
Wakefield More »
 
4,323
5,787
978
11,088
Waltham More »
 
6,933
7,551
2,301
16,785
Watertown More »
 
5,633
4,860
1,646
12,139
Wayland More »
 
2,543
3,099
807
6,449
Westford More »
 
3,325
5,228
774
9,327
Weston More »
 
1,758
2,738
631
5,127
Wilmington More »
 
3,295
4,776
766
8,837
Winchester More »
 
3,831
5,259
971
10,061
Woburn More »
 
5,692
7,230
1,525
14,447
County Totals
227,498
248,759
62,187 538,444