Summary of Question 2
This proposed law would expand the state's beverage container deposit law, also known as the Bottle Bill, to require deposits on containers for all non-alcoholic non-carbonated drinks in liquid form intended for human consumption, except beverages primarily derived from dairy products, infant formula, and FDA approved medicines. The proposed law would not cover containers made of paper-based biodegradable material and aseptic multi-material packages such as juice boxes or pouches.
The proposed law would require the state Secretary of Energy and Environmental Affairs (EEA) to adjust the container deposit amount every five years to reflect (to the nearest whole cent) changes in the consumer price index, but the value could not be set below five cents.
The proposed law would increase the minimum handling fee that beverage distributors must pay dealers for each properly returned empty beverage container, which was 2 1/4 cents as of September 2013, to 3 1/2 cents. It would also increase the minimum handling fee that bottlers must pay distributors and dealers for each properly returned empty reusable beverage container, which was 1 cent as of September 2013, to 3 1/2 cents. The Secretary of EEA would review the fee amounts every five years and make appropriate adjustments to reflect changes in the consumer price index as well as changes in the costs incurred by redemption centers. The proposed law defines a redemption center as any business whose primary purpose is the redemption of beverage containers and that is not ancillary to any other business.
The proposed law would direct the Secretary of EEA to issue regulations allowing small dealers to seek exemptions from accepting empty deposit containers. The proposed law would define small dealer as any person or business, including the operator of a vending machine, who sells beverages in beverage containers to consumers, with a contiguous retail space of 3,000 square feet or less, excluding office and stock room space; and fewer than four locations under the same ownership in the Commonwealth. The proposed law would require that the regulations consider at least the health, safety, and convenience of the public, including the distribution of dealers and redemption centers by population or by distance or both.
The proposed law would set up a state Clean Environment Fund to receive certain unclaimed container deposits. The Fund would be used, subject to appropriation by the state Legislature, to support programs such as the proper management of solid waste, water resource protection, parkland, urban forestry, air quality and climate protection.
The proposed law would allow a dealer, distributor, redemption center or bottler to refuse to accept any beverage container that is not marked as being refundable in Massachusetts.
The proposed law would take effect on April 22, 2015.
Actions
2014 - Middlesex County - Question 2Do you approve of a law summarized below, on which no vote was taken by the Senate or the House of Representatives on or before May 6, 2014?
View as: # | % | Middlesex County Results |
City/Town | Ward | Pct | Blanks | Total Votes Cast | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Totals | 157,661 |
361,957 |
12,061 | 531,679 | ||
Acton
More » |
3,581 |
5,048 |
107 |
8,736 |
||
Arlington
More » |
8,612 |
10,735 |
394 |
19,741 |
||
Ashby |
254 |
1,039 |
11 |
1,304 |
||
Ashland
More » |
1,165 |
4,483 |
88 |
5,736 |
||
Ayer
More » |
472 |
1,990 |
28 |
2,490 |
||
Bedford
More » |
1,674 |
3,902 |
88 |
5,664 |
||
Belmont
More » |
4,553 |
5,623 |
169 |
10,345 |
||
Billerica
More » |
1,458 |
12,678 |
98 |
14,234 |
||
Boxborough |
705 |
1,374 |
23 |
2,102 |
||
Burlington
More » |
1,403 |
7,817 |
114 |
9,334 |
||
Cambridge
More » |
19,518 |
11,718 |
1,489 |
32,725 |
||
Carlisle |
1,104 |
1,403 |
34 |
2,541 |
||
Chelmsford
More » |
2,308 |
11,713 |
157 |
14,178 |
||
Concord
More » |
4,153 |
3,981 |
140 |
8,274 |
||
Dracut
More » |
954 |
9,492 |
184 |
10,630 |
||
Dunstable |
251 |
1,133 |
10 |
1,394 |
||
Everett
More » |
1,522 |
7,435 |
423 |
9,380 |
||
Framingham
More » |
4,592 |
14,033 |
384 |
19,009 |
||
Groton
More » |
1,289 |
3,064 |
159 |
4,512 |
||
Holliston
More » |
1,450 |
4,634 |
53 |
6,137 |
||
Hopkinton
More » |
1,298 |
4,916 |
61 |
6,275 |
||
Hudson
More » |
1,278 |
5,745 |
141 |
7,164 |
||
Lexington
More » |
6,026 |
6,919 |
356 |
13,301 |
||
Lincoln
More » |
1,608 |
1,127 |
54 |
2,789 |
||
Littleton
More » |
1,115 |
2,936 |
45 |
4,096 |
||
Lowell
More » |
3,852 |
15,965 |
1,451 |
21,268 |
||
Malden
More » |
3,304 |
10,331 |
590 |
14,225 |
||
Marlborough
More » |
1,999 |
9,454 |
220 |
11,673 |
||
Maynard
More » |
1,322 |
2,935 |
58 |
4,315 |
||
Medford
More » |
5,390 |
13,582 |
580 |
19,552 |
||
Melrose
More » |
3,204 |
8,417 |
211 |
11,832 |
||
Natick
More » |
3,719 |
9,775 |
186 |
13,680 |
||
Newton
More » |
14,624 |
17,519 |
876 |
33,019 |
||
N. Reading
More » |
984 |
5,244 |
43 |
6,271 |
||
Pepperell
More » |
855 |
3,692 |
36 |
4,583 |
||
Reading
More » |
2,939 |
7,743 |
109 |
10,791 |
||
Sherborn |
871 |
1,134 |
24 |
2,029 |
||
Shirley |
394 |
1,858 |
26 |
2,278 |
||
Somerville
More » |
11,988 |
10,073 |
783 |
22,844 |
||
Stoneham
More » |
1,320 |
7,754 |
163 |
9,237 |
||
Stow
More » |
1,082 |
2,114 |
23 |
3,219 |
||
Sudbury
More » |
2,542 |
4,946 |
83 |
7,571 |
||
Tewksbury
More » |
1,030 |
10,283 |
99 |
11,412 |
||
Townsend
More » |
472 |
2,820 |
13 |
3,305 |
||
Tyngsborough
More » |
527 |
3,947 |
47 |
4,521 |
||
Wakefield
More » |
1,797 |
8,855 |
143 |
10,795 |
||
Waltham
More » |
4,537 |
11,749 |
485 |
16,771 |
||
Watertown
More » |
4,489 |
6,948 |
281 |
11,718 |
||
Wayland
More » |
2,364 |
3,440 |
97 |
5,901 |
||
Westford
More » |
1,781 |
7,457 |
65 |
9,303 |
||
Weston
More » |
1,775 |
2,877 |
79 |
4,731 |
||
Wilmington
More » |
954 |
8,003 |
105 |
9,062 |
||
Winchester
More » |
3,183 |
6,467 |
134 |
9,784 |
||
Woburn
More » |
2,020 |
11,637 |
241 |
13,898 |
||
County Totals | 157,661 |
361,957 |
12,061 | 531,679 |