| 1980 |
1 |
The proposed amendment would add a new article to the state Constitution which would prohibit discrimination against handicapped people. It would provide that no otherwise qualified handicapped individual could, on the sole basis of that handicap, be excluded from participation in, denied the benefi...See Details » |
Constitutional Amendment |
Statewide |
| Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes 
|
1,503,771 |
66.5% |
No
|
758,978 |
33.5% |
| Blanks |
303,918 |
|
| Total Votes Cast |
2,566,667 |
See Details » |
|
| 1980 |
5 |
The proposed amendment would limit the power of the legislature to impose certain costs on cities and towns. It would provide that any law which imposes additional costs upon two or more cities or towns by regulating the compensation, hours, status, conditions, or benefits of municipal employment wo...See Details » |
Constitutional Amendment |
Statewide |
| Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
1,401,897 |
66.0% |
No
|
722,425 |
34.0% |
| Blanks |
442,345 |
|
| Total Votes Cast |
2,566,667 |
See Details » |
|
| 1980 |
6 |
The proposed amendment would change the procedure by which the Legislature declares a measure to be an emergency law, making it effective when it is signed by the Governor. The amendment would allow the Legislature to make such a declaration by a voice vote, rather than by a recorded vote, as now re...See Details » |
Constitutional Amendment |
Statewide |
| Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
610,138 |
29.2% |
No
|
1,479,110 |
70.8% |
| Blanks |
477,419 |
|
| Total Votes Cast |
2,566,667 |
See Details » |
|
